<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Maruti Suzuki R3 MPV Concept Twittique – A quick design review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2010/01/2010-maruti-suzuki-r3-mpv-concept-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2010/01/2010-maruti-suzuki-r3-mpv-concept-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/</link>
	<description>Critiquing Automotive Design Aesthetics - Concept and Production - Car Design Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best SUV</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2010/01/2010-maruti-suzuki-r3-mpv-concept-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3973</link>
		<dc:creator>Best SUV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=466#comment-3973</guid>
		<description>Now, I do know its not fashionable to defend Suzuki, but all of the Suzuki snubbing I read on the blogs is getting very tiresome and unnecessary.  I, too, used to hold round previous stereotypes of what vehicles are good vs. bad.  Then, I did some common sense self-education.  I keep in mind a time in the not too distant past when Audi, VW, Mini, and Ford have been criticized for their less than reliable, so-so cars.  Now, many people cannot live without the Audi A4, VW CC, Ford Fusion, and Mini Cooper.  Not everybody can afford to drive an Audi R8 or Fusion Hybrid, nor does everyone need to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I do know its not fashionable to defend Suzuki, but all of the Suzuki snubbing I read on the blogs is getting very tiresome and unnecessary.  I, too, used to hold round previous stereotypes of what vehicles are good vs. bad.  Then, I did some common sense self-education.  I keep in mind a time in the not too distant past when Audi, VW, Mini, and Ford have been criticized for their less than reliable, so-so cars.  Now, many people cannot live without the Audi A4, VW CC, Ford Fusion, and Mini Cooper.  Not everybody can afford to drive an Audi R8 or Fusion Hybrid, nor does everyone need to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzuki Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2010/01/2010-maruti-suzuki-r3-mpv-concept-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzuki Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=466#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>The new R3 could be a real winner I think and the satin finish is a masterstroke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new R3 could be a real winner I think and the satin finish is a masterstroke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

