<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Audi R8 Spider Twittique – A quick design review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/</link>
	<description>Critiquing Automotive Design Aesthetics - Concept and Production - Car Design Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>The R8 Spyder looks proper , but I think for the same price I would rather have a 911 Turbo cabriolet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The R8 Spyder looks proper , but I think for the same price I would rather have a 911 Turbo cabriolet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: Audi R8 Spyder Production - Teamspeed.com</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: Audi R8 Spyder Production - Teamspeed.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>[...] R8 loss/gain     Wow, that&#039;s pretty nice to see come together...  In terms of design I like the addition of the vents over the engine bay area, but i&#039;m having mixed feelings of the missing sideblade.  Did a quick render on how it would look like with a partial sideblade, I think it would have been difficult, but still cooler and have more a distinctive relation to the coupe.  AutoCritical 2010 Audi R8 Spider Twittique ? A quick design review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] R8 loss/gain     Wow, that&#39;s pretty nice to see come together&#8230;  In terms of design I like the addition of the vents over the engine bay area, but i&#39;m having mixed feelings of the missing sideblade.  Did a quick render on how it would look like with a partial sideblade, I think it would have been difficult, but still cooler and have more a distinctive relation to the coupe.  AutoCritical 2010 Audi R8 Spider Twittique ? A quick design review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutoCritical</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoCritical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-730</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-727&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Rob &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-728&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Andrew &lt;/a&gt; 

Thanks for the kind comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-727" rel="nofollow">@Rob </a><br />
<a href="#comment-728" rel="nofollow">@Andrew </a> </p>
<p>Thanks for the kind comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutoCritical</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoCritical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-729</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-726&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@r8ftw &lt;/a&gt; 
Maybe I should have a go at it! In my mind I would have thought it would have formed a &#039;bridge&#039; over the back of the car, going through those vents, as you can see, there are already lines there to enable this, but as I have not seen this car in the flesh/metal, how feasible it will be is another story altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-726" rel="nofollow">@r8ftw </a><br />
Maybe I should have a go at it! In my mind I would have thought it would have formed a &#8216;bridge&#8217; over the back of the car, going through those vents, as you can see, there are already lines there to enable this, but as I have not seen this car in the flesh/metal, how feasible it will be is another story altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Awesome photoshop with the side blade. Would look awesome that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome photoshop with the side blade. Would look awesome that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Great review and great website.  I absolutely love the mashup with the coupe vents.  That does a few things for me. One, I think the added boldness you spoke of is really needed to make a supercar statement and, two, I think that without the coupe&#039;s vents it looks too long and out of proper proportion from front to back.  I love those hood louvres though, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review and great website.  I absolutely love the mashup with the coupe vents.  That does a few things for me. One, I think the added boldness you spoke of is really needed to make a supercar statement and, two, I think that without the coupe&#8217;s vents it looks too long and out of proper proportion from front to back.  I love those hood louvres though, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r8ftw</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>r8ftw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Hmm now that i look better at it i think you have a point...but i think you should alter the other pics as well (especially the one from the rear) too see how the side blades fit in. I have a vague hunch they don&#039;t fit very well, and that&#039;s the reason they were ditched from the roadster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm now that i look better at it i think you have a point&#8230;but i think you should alter the other pics as well (especially the one from the rear) too see how the side blades fit in. I have a vague hunch they don&#8217;t fit very well, and that&#8217;s the reason they were ditched from the roadster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r8ftw</title>
		<link>http://www.autocritical.com/blog/2009/09/2010-audi-r8-spider-twittique-%e2%80%93-a-quick-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>r8ftw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autocritical.com/blog/?p=372#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Actually i think it looks better without the side blade...but that&#039;s just me lol. It looks cool either way though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually i think it looks better without the side blade&#8230;but that&#8217;s just me lol. It looks cool either way though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

